Publication date: 15th December 2014
Water electrolysis, combined with renewable electric power generation technologies, is expected to emerge as a low-emission method for storing excess electricity or for producing hydrogen fuel as part of a solar refinery.1-3 Acid Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) electrolyzers show advantages compared to alkaline electrolyzers in terms of compact system design, operating at high current densities with high voltage efficiency, and providing high gas purity.4 However, acidic environment in PEM electrolyzers requires noble metal catalysts, e.g. RuOx, IrOx for the anodic oxygen evolution reaction (OER).5,6 IrOx appears as a catalyst of choice compromising activity and stability.2 However, the scarce nature of Ir requires significant reduction of Ir loading, which is why novel strategies are critically needed to further reduce the amount of Ir in OER catalysts.
Herein, a family of dealloyed metal–oxide hybrid (M1M2@M1Ox) core@shell nanoparticles immobilized on high surface area (oxide) support is demonstrated to provide substantial advances toward more efficient, stable and less expensive electrocatalytic water splitting. IrNi@IrOx nanoparticles were synthesized from IrNix precursor alloys through selective surface Ni dealloying and controlled surface oxidation of Ir.7,8 Detailed depth-resolved insight into chemical structure, composition, morphology, and oxidation state was obtained using XRD, STEM-EDX, XPS, which confirmed our structural hypotheses. A 3-fold catalytic activity enhancement for the electrochemical OER over Ir benchmark catalyst was observed for the core-shell catalysts on a noble metal mass basis. This study documents the successful use of synthetic dealloying for the preparation of oxide supported core-shell catalysts. The concept is quite general, can be applied to other noble metal nanoparticles, and points out a path forward to nanostructured proton-exchange-electrolyzer electrodes with dramatically reduced noble metal content.
References
(1) Chemical Energy Storage Schloegl, R., Ed.; De Gruyter Berlin, 2013.
(2) Reier, T.; Oezaslan, M.; Strasser, P. ACS Catalysis 2012, 2, 1765.
(3) Dau, H.; Limberg, C.; Reier, T.; Risch, M.; Roggan, S.; Strasser, P. ChemCatChem 2010, 2, 724.
(4) Carmo, M.; Fritz, D. L.; Mergel, J.; Stolten, D. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 4901.
(5) Millet, P.; Mbemba, N.; Grigoriev, S. A.; Fateev, V. N.; Aukauloo, A.; Etiévant, C. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2011, 36, 4134.
(6) Reier, T.; Teschner, D.; Lunkenbein, T.; Bergmann, A.; Selve, S.; Kraehnert, R.; Schlögl, R.; Strasser, P. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2014, 161, F876.
(7) Nong, H. N.; Gan, L.; Willinger, E.; Teschner, D.; Strasser, P. Chemical Science 2014, 5, 2955.
(8) Nong, H. N.; Oh, H. S; Reier, T.; Willinger, E; Willinger, M. G.; Petkov, V.; Teschner, D; Strasser, P. Angewandte Chemie 2014.