Proceedings of nanoGe Fall Meeting19 (NFM19)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29363/nanoge.nfm.2019.275
Publication date: 18th July 2019
Negative emissions are an integral part of most scenarios for limiting global warming to 2 °C or below. However, the feasibility of the various technological approaches to remove dilute CO2 from the atmosphere for permanent storage is still unclear.[1,2] While natural photosynthesis is scalable and features established products for long-term storage, its low conversion efficiency translates to vast footprints in terms of the required area.[1,3] Here, photoelectrochemical approaches could reduce the conflict with food production as they provide significantly higher efficiencies, require less water, and do not depend on arable land.[3] We give an overview of the approaches discussed in the literature, from negative-emissions solar hydrogen production[2] to photoelectrochemical CO2 reduction. Furthermore, we introduce a definition of solar-to-carbon efficiency, which is better suited to rank approaches for negative emissions. We show that the most efficient products in terms of CO2 removal efficiency deviate from those considered for solar fuels, which therefore require new absorber-catalyst combinations. Finally, we discuss feasibility, land footprint, and costs of these photoelectrochemical carbon sinks for the -10 Gt/year target in 2050.
We thank the fellowship programme of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, grant LPDS 2015-09 (MMM), the German Research Foundation (RE3994-2/1, KR) and the Volkswagen Foundation for funding.