What’s Keeping Narrow-Bandgap Derivatives from Surpassing Parent Y6 in Solar Performance?
Atul Shukla a, Manasi Pranav a, Guorui He a, Davide Mascione a, Yonglin Cao b, Yufei Gong c, Drew Riley d, Julian Steele e, Alexander Ehm f, Ardalan Armin d, Safa Shoaee a b, Dietrich Zahn f, Yongfang Li c, Lei Meng c, Felix Lang a, Dieter Neher a
a Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 24–25, 14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
b Paul-Drude-Institut für Festkörperelektronik, Leibniz-Institut im Forschungsverbund Berlin e.V. Hausvogteiplatz 5-7, 10117 Berlin, Germany
c Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2 North 1st Street, Haidian, Beijing 100190, China
d Sustainable Advanced Materials Programme (Sêr SAM), Department of Physics, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, United Kingdom
e Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia
f Semiconductor Physics, TU Chemnitz, 09107 Chemnitz, Germany
Materials for Sustainable Development Conference (MATSUS)
Proceedings of MATSUS Spring 2025 Conference (MATSUSSpring25)
Understanding success of OSCs: stability and efficiency - #SuccessOPV
Sevilla, Spain, 2025 March 3rd - 7th
Organizers: Tracey Clarke and Vida Engmann
Oral, Manasi Pranav, presentation 577
DOI: https://doi.org/10.29363/nanoge.matsusspring.2025.577
Publication date: 16th December 2024

Despite having similar power conversion efficiency limits according to detailed balance, the performance of Y6 in organic photovoltaic blends still outshines that of its narrower bandgap derivatives, as shown in the TOC plot adapted from ref [1]. An understanding of the underlying mechanisms is needed to tap into the potential of low-bandgap non-fullerene acceptors (NFAs) for tandem applications and beyond. Thus motivated, we scrutinize two low-bandgap NFAs – BTPV-eF-eC9 and BTPV-4Cl-eC9 – in binary devices from the perspective of photocurrent generation, and resolve the losses incurred at each step between photon absorption and carrier extraction. With a combination of steady state and time-resolved optoelectronic techniques, we find that in these acceptors, the kinetic competition between charge-transfer state decay and its separation is a major limiting role in the overall photon harvesting capability of the devices. Despite having similar voltage losses as PM6:Y6, which we attribute to efficient charge-transfer formation at lower driving forces, the geminate loss pathway via the charge-transfer state curbs fill factor and photocurrent. This reinforces the notion that suppression of geminate loss pathways can vitally balance recombination losses with improved charge generation, and markedly move the overall internal quantum efficiency towards the detailed balance limit.

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info