Electrolyte Effects on CO2 Electrochemical Reduction at Sn Metallic Electrode
Maria Pinto a b, Rafael Vos b, Raphael Nagao a, Marc Koper b
a Instituto de Química, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 13083-862, Brazil
b Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Leiden University
Materials for Sustainable Development Conference (MATSUS)
Proceedings of MATSUS Spring 2024 Conference (MATSUS24)
#MatInter - Materials and Interfaces for emerging electrocatalytic reactions
Barcelona, Spain, 2024 March 4th - 8th
Organizers: Marta Costa Figueiredo and María Escudero-Escribano
Poster, Maria Pinto, 493
Publication date: 18th December 2023

The electrochemical reduction of CO2 (CO2RR) powered with renewable electricity sources provides an alternative to conventional fossil-fuel technologies. Valuable chemicals with a reduced carbon footprint can be obtained from the electrochemical CO2RR, such as formic acid, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and alcohols.[1] Formic acid is often highlighted as the most economically viable product for industrial applications in CO2RR technologies.[2] The selectivity and activity in the CO2RR are influenced by several factors, such as the electrocatalyst and electrolyte composition. Tin electrocatalysts are known for their high selectivity towards formic acid/formate. Some advantages of employing Tin-based electrocatalysts include the abundance of Sn and its non-toxicity. On the other hand, to achieve industrial-relevant reaction rates at significant faradaic efficiencies, high overpotentials are often required for CO2RR on Sn-based catalysts. The influence of the reaction environment, including ion identity, concentration, and pH on the activity and selectivity of CO2RR has received increasing attention in the last years. However, most recent research focuses on noble metals,[3] while understanding CO2RR processes on Sn is still lacking. In this work, we studied how electrolyte conditions impact the selectivity and activity of the electrochemical CO2RR on metallic Sn. Using a two-compartment electrochemical cell and employing online gas chromatography and liquid chromatography we measured the production of formic acid, carbon monoxide, and hydrogen at different cathodic potentials and electrolyte conditions under mildly acidic conditions (pH 4). At low overpotentials and low electrolyte concentrations, the dominant process is the Hydrogen Evolution Reaction (HER) when production rates for formic acid production are still low. At increasing the negative overpotential, the CO2RR to formic acid becomes the primary reaction, and the CO and H2 are minority products. The electrolyte concentration significantly influences the overall CO2RR activity, particularly in formic acid production, while its impact on the CO rate is lower. The activity towards HCOOH and CO is enhanced with cations’ concentration and size, following their tendency to accumulate near the electrode surface (Li+ < K+ < Cs+). The competing HER is hardly influenced by applied potential, electrolyte concentration, or cation size at pH 4. Additionally, we explored the impact of buffering anions in acting as proton donors by comparing sulfate and bicarbonate solutions. The results showed a drastic increase in HER activity, in high-content bicarbonate solutions in neutral pH, surpassing the activity at pH 4 in sulfate electrolyte. This showcases the crucial role of buffering anions in affecting CO2RR activity on Sn electrodes by promoting competitive HER. Our study provides insights into Sn's activity and selectivity for CO2RR in mildly acidic conditions. By optimizing reaction parameters such as applied potential and electrolyte composition, we can steer the reaction towards the desired outcome products, with a specific emphasis on formic acid.

 

Authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from FAPESP (São Paulo Research Foundation); M. R. P. (2022/03750-0 and 2019/08244-2) and R. N. (2021/08868-6). R. N acknowledges Shell - CINE (Center for Innovation on New Energies; Division 1: Dense Energy Carriers (2017/11986-5), and the strategic importance of the support given by ANP (Brazil’s National Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels Agency, through the R&D levy regulation) support. R. N. (402481/2021-6 and 421313/2023-4) acknowledges CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico).

© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info