What causes dispersive transport?
Bronson Philippa a, Ronald D. White a, Paul L. Burn b, Paul Meredith b, Martin Stolterfoht b, Chellappan Vijila c, Almantas Pivrikas d, Prashant Sonar e, Gytis Juška f
a College of Science, Technology and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville 4811
b The University of Queensland, Centre for Organic Photonics & Electronics (COPE), School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences and School of Mathematics and Physics, Brisbane 4072, Australia
c Institute of Materials Research and Engineering, A*STAR (Agency for Science, Technology and Research), 3 Research Link, 117602
d School of Engineering and Information Technology, Murdoch University, Perth 6150
e School of Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia, George Street, 2, Brisbane City, Australia
f Department of Solid State Electronics, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio 9, Vilnius, 10222, Lithuania
International Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics
Proceedings of International Conference on Hybrid and Organic Photovoltaics 2015 (HOPV15)
Roma, Italy, 2015 May 11th - 13th
Organizer: Filippo De Angelis
Oral, Bronson Philippa, presentation 148
Publication date: 5th February 2015

Charge transport in bulk heterojunction solar cells is often affected by dispersion. Dispersive transport causes the transient extraction photocurrent to reduce over time, inhibiting charge extraction and likely harming device performance. In organic semiconductors, it has been suggested that dispersive transport is caused by a time-dependent mobility, as predicted by the well-known Gaussian Disorder Model. According to that model, the mobility of charge carriers reduces as they lose energy within the density of states. Therefore, decaying photocurrent transients are apparently explained through energetic relaxation. However, we report measurements in three bulk heterojunction photovoltaic blends that are inconsistent with this hypothesis, and therefore argue that an alternative explanation is needed in the studied systems.

We measured charge extraction transients in solar cells made from poly[N-9’’-hepta-decanyl-2,7-carbazole-alt-5,5-(4’,7’-di-2-thienyl-2’,1’,3’-benzothiadiazole)] (PCDTBT):[6,6] phenyl-C70-butyric-acid-methyl-ester (PC70BM), poly[[4,8-bis[(2-ethylhexyl)oxy]benzo[1,2-b:4,5-b’]dithiophene-2,6-diyl] [3-fluoro-2-[(2-ethylhexyl)carbonyl]thieno[3,4-b]thiophenediyl]] (PTB7):PC70BM, and poly[3,6-dithi- ophene-2-yl-2,5-di(2-octyldodecyl)-pyrrolo[3,4-c]pyrrole-1,4-dione-alt-naphthalene] (PDPP-TNT):PC70BM. If energetic relaxation is the cause of dispersive transport, then the mobility should change as a function of the transit time, because longer transit times allow for greater relaxation to occur. We varied the transit time by changing the electric field and device thickness, and we observed no dependence upon either. We tested different photon energies to determine whether “hot carriers” take longer to relax, and we observed no dependence. Finally, we tested the time-dependence of mobility with the photo-CELIV technique, and again observed no dependence.

We conclude that there is negligible energetic relaxation on the timescale needed to explain dispersive transport. We propose an alternative mechanism for the decaying photocurrent: that charge carriers are increasingly captured by trap states. Consequently, trap states appear to be more important than thermalisation in the studied devices, and efforts should be directed towards reducing the density of trap states rather than managing high-energy “hot” carriers.


Schematic illustration of two pathways to dispersive transport. (a) Thermalisation causes the mobility to decrease with time, whereas (b) trapping causes the loss of carrier density.
[1] Philippa, B.; Stolterfoht, M.; Burn, P. L.; Juška, G.; Meredith, P.; White, R. D.; Pivrikas, A. The impact of hot charge carrier mobility on photocurrent losses in polymer-based solar cells. Scientific Reports 2014, 4, 5695. [2] Philippa, B.; Vijila, C.; White, R. D.; Sonar, P.; Burn, P. L.; Meredith, P.; Pivrikas, A. Time-independent charge carrier mobility in a model polymer:fullerene organic solar cell. Organic Electronics 2015, 16, 205–211.
© FUNDACIO DE LA COMUNITAT VALENCIANA SCITO
We use our own and third party cookies for analysing and measuring usage of our website to improve our services. If you continue browsing, we consider accepting its use. You can check our Cookies Policy in which you will also find how to configure your web browser for the use of cookies. More info