Proceedings of Catalyst Design Strategies for Photo- and Electrochemical Fuel Synthesis (ECAT25)
Publication date: 19th December 2024
There is a misunderstanding in the PEC community about the actual physical cause of charge separation in semiconductors at non-equilibrium conditions. Briefly, the most common explanation for photocurrent generation in photoelectrodes assumes that electron-hole pair separation occurs near the surface due to the internal built-in electric field created by band-bending at the solid/liquid interface in equilibrium (i.e. dark conditions, no bias applied). This interpretation suggests that the built-in electric field independently drives positive and negative charges toward their respective contacts. However, this view leads to the several discrepancies that will be described in the talk. As it will be discussed, it is the gradient of the charge carrier's chemical potential (i.e. their QFLs under non-equilibrium conditions) that actually drives the charge separation, via the establishment of selective contacts for electrons and holes [1, 2]. The usual FTO/semiconducting photoanode interface is likely acting as a "good enough" electron selective contact, thus imposing enough gradient to the QFLs to drive the charge separation under illumination conditions. It will be discussed how the so-far lack of optimized selective contacts for semiconducting oxides (together with defect trap states and polaron-type of transport) could explain why the observed photovoltage for this class of materials is consistently well below their detailed balance (Schottky-Queisser) limit [3].
In the second part of the talk, the influence of various acidic electrolytes (KPi, K2SO4, Na2SO4, NaClO4, and NaNO3; pH = 2) on the PEC glycerol oxidation over BiVO4 will be discussed. We observed that BiVO4 exhibited the following GOR performance trend: NaClO4, NaNO3 > Na2SO4 > K2SO4 > KPi, with the photocurrent in NaClO4 ∼3-fold of that in KPi [4]. Although our BiVO4 photoanodes exhibited the highest photocurrent in NaClO4, the low production rate of GOR products, due to the poor stability of BiVO4 in this electrolyte solution, made it less promising than NaNO3. NaNO3 emerged as the preferred electrolyte for PEC glycerol oxidation on BiVO4, offering superior performance in terms of photocurrent, stability, and selectivity towards value-added GOR products [4]. Glycolaldehyde was identified as the most dominant GOR product in our study, achieving a selectivity of more than 50% in NaNO3.